Efficiency Ranking of Iranian Power Plants Using Super Efficiency Method

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Tabriz

2 MA. in Economics,, University of Tabriz

Abstract

Nowadays, by increasing development of societies, the demand for various types of energy, including electricity, has increased significantly. Therefore, it seems necessary to pay attention to energy efficiency, especially electricity. Due to the existence of several power plants throughout the country, as well as the high cost of establishing, repairing, maintaining and supplying new power plant components, calculating the efficiency of existing power plants and ranking them and comparing them with each other in terms of efficiency can be a useful step to make the most of the existing production capacity of existing power plants and bring them to the highest possible level of efficiency and productivity. There are a variety of methods for calculating the efficiency and ranking of decision making units (DMUs), one of the most important of them is data envelopment analysis (DEA), especially the super-efficiency method. In this paper, the efficiency of Iran's thermal power plants in 2016 has been ranked using the super efficiency model.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Adler, N., Friedman, L., & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002). Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European journal of operational research, 140(2), 249-265.
  2. Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 39(10), 1261-1264.
  3. Askari Robati, G., Habibi Mahalli, G. (2016). Evaluate the performance and compare the efficiency of power plants using data envelopment analysis technique. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management, Tehran, (In Persian).
  4.  Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, F., Anvari, M., Izadbakhsh, H., & Dehghan, S. (2007). Performance assessment and optimization of thermal power plants by DEA BCC and multivariate analysis.
  5. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  6.  Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Swarts, J., & Thomas, D. (1989). An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses. Research in governmental and nonprofit accounting, 5, 125-163.
  7. Bazaraa, M. S., Jarvis, J. J., & Sherali, H. D. (2011). Linear programming and network flows. John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
  9. Chen, C. M. (2013). Super efficiencies or super inefficiencies? Insights from a joint computation model for slacks-based measures in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 258-267.
  10. Chen, Y. (2004). Ranking efficient units in DEA. Omega, 32(3), 213-219.
  11. Chen, Y. (2005). Measuring Super Efficiency in DEA in the Presence of Infeasibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 161: 545-551.
  12. Chen, J. X., Deng, M., & Gingras, S. (2011). A modified super-efficiency measure based on simultaneous input–output projection in data envelopment analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 38(2), 496-504.
  13. Chen, Y., Du, J., & Huo, J. (2013). Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function. Omega, 41(3), 621-625.
  14. Chen, Y., & Liang, L. (2011). Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: One model approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 359-360.
  1. Cook, W. D., Liang, L., Zha, Y., & Zhu, J. (2009). A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(2), 276-281.
  2. Ebrahimi Mehr, M.R. (2009). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Coelli,T., Institute of Business Studies And Research, (In Persian).
  3. Esfandyai Mohammad, Fallah Jelodar Mehdi,Darvish Motevali Mohammad Hosein (2011). A Combination Model Design For University Employees Performance Appraisal, Using Data Envelop Analysis And Fuzzi Logic Set (A Case Study). Journal Of Management, Volume  8 , Number  22 ; Page(s) 24 To 35, (In Persian).
  4. Falahi M.A., Ahmadi V., Measuring The Efficiency of Iranian Electricity Distribution Companies, Tahghighat-e-Eghtesadi   Winter 2006 , Volume 40 , Number 4; Page(s) 297 To 320, (In Persian).  
  5. Jafari, F., Dibachi, H. & Izadikhah, M. (2017). Evaluating the efficiency and ranking of regional electricity companies in Iran using random DEA in the presence of normal distribution. 10th International Conference of the Iranian Operations Research Association. Babolsar: Iranian Operations Research Association, (In Persian).  
  6.  Javaheri, Z., Khameneh, A., (2009). Evaluation Performance of Iranian Thermal Power Plants Using Data Envelopment Analysis Method. The First National on The Thermal Power Plants Instudy. Tehran University.
  7. Lee, H. S., Chu, C. W., & Zhu, J. (2011). Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility. European Journal of Operational Research, 212(1), 141-147.
  8. Lee, H. S., & Zhu, J. (2012). Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(2), 429-433.
  9. Li, S., Jahanshahloo, G. R., & Khodabakhshi, M. (2007). A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Applied mathematics and computation, 184(2), 638-648.
  10. Lin, R., & Chen, Z. (2015). Super-efficiency measurement under variable return to scale: an approach based on a new directional distance function. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(9), 1506-1510.
  11. Lin, R., & Chen, Z. (2018). Modified super-efficiency DEA models for solving infeasibility under non-negative data set. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 56(3), 265-285.
  12. Liu, C. H., Lin, S. J., & Lewis, C. (2010). Evaluation of thermal power plant operational performance in Taiwan by data envelopment analysis. Energy policy, 38(2), 1049-1058.
  13. Motafakker Azad, M., Pourebadollahan Covich, M., Fallahi, F., Ranj Pour, R., Sojoodi, S., (2014). Measuring the Technical Efficiency of Iranian Thermal Power Plants and Analysis of its Determinants: Application of Stochastic Nonparametric Data Envelopment Method, Tahghighate Eghtesadi, 106, 93-113, (In Persian).
  14. Mehrabian, S., Alirezaee, M. R., & Jahanshahloo, G. R. (1999). A complete efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis. Computational optimization and applications, 14(2), 261-266.
  15. Meng, X. L., & Shi, F. G. (2017). An extended inequality approach for evaluating decision making units with a single output. Journal of inequalities and applications, 2017(1), 199.
  16. Pourkazemi, M.H., Heydari,K. (2002). Data Envelopment Analysis And Its Application In Evaluating The Efficiency of Power Plants In Iran. Modern Human Sciences, Volume 6, Number 1 (Tome 24); Page(s) 35 To 54, (In Persian).
  17. Sadraei Javaheri, A., Ostadzad, A. (2014). Estimating Efficiency of Thermal and Hydroelectric Power Plants in Iranian Provinces, Economics Studies (JELS), Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 19-42, (In Persian).
  18. Saglam, Ü. (2018, November). The Efficiency Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources with Data Envelopment Analysis. In 2018 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute Proceedings, Chicago IL.
  1. Sarica, K., (2017). Parametric VS. Non-Parametric Efficiency Assessment: Case of Power Plants in Turkey, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 3.
  2. Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 37(2), 174-187.
  3.  Shafee Nikabadi, M., Shahroodi, K.,  Oveysiomran, A. & Khosravi, M., (2019). Inputs and Outputs Selection of Data Envelopment Analysis to Evaluate the Performance of Regional Electricity Companies in Iran by Neural Network. Industrial Management Studies, Volume 16, Issue 51, Pages 181-206, (In Persian).
  4. Shahiki Tash, Mohammadnabi,   Hasani, Mostafa Khajeh &    Jafari, Saeid (2015). Assessment of the Environmental Performance in Energy Intensive Industries of Iran by Using Directional Distance Function Approach, Applied Theorical of Economics, Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 99-120, (In Persian).  
  5. Shahin, A., Malekpoor, H., Tavan, F. & Karami, M. (2013). Ranking of Renewable Power Plants Using Data Envelopment Analysis, Case Study: Hydropower Plants in 2011. Second National Conference on Industrial and Systems Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Najaf Abad, (In Persian).
  6. Tone, K. (2001). A Slack-Based Measure of Super Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research.
  7. Golany, B., Roll, Y., & Rybak, D. (1994). Measuring efficiency of power plants in Israel by data envelopment analysis. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 41(3), 291-301.
  8. Gholipour Khatir, F., Mazyaki, A., Houri Jafari, H., Effect of Cutting Subsidies on Technical Efficiency of Power Plants in Iran. QEER. 2018; 14 (57) :125-146, (In Persian).
  9. Yang, T., Chen, W., Zhou, K., & Ren, M. (2018). Regional energy efficiency evaluation in China: A super efficiency slack-based measure model with undesirable outputs. Journal of cleaner production, 198, 859-866.
  10. Zhu, J., (1996). Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of operational research, 90(3), 451-460.