The effect of mental poverty on labor performance

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Alzahra Universuty

2 Faculty of social sciences and economics, Alzahra Universuty. Tehran, Iran.

3 Alzahra Universuty. Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

This study uses an innovative questionnaire to investigate the effect of mental poverty on the performance of human resources in an Iranian sample. Evidence from behavioural economics shows that mental poverty defined as reduced cognitive capacity due to scarcity and financial worries affect individuals’ performance. The innovative questionnaire that has been distributed and completed among the same people at the beginning and end of a given month has made it possible to exogenously impose mental poverty through time. It is assumed that workers are more likely to suffer from mental poverty at the end of the month when most of their income is consumed. Therefore, they are expected to have lower cognitive performance at the end of a given month. Data on individuals' performance in IQ tests, Frederick cognitive test and simple math questions is collected through the questionnaire. The questionnaire is distributed among 161 selected government employees in two rounds; once at the beginning of a given month and once at the end of the same month. The findings indicate that there is a negative and significant relation between mental poverty and labour performance in IQ tests

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Adler, N., Stewart,J., Cohen, S., Cullen,M., Roux, A., Dow, W., & Williams, D. (2007). Reaching for a Healthier Life: Facts on Socioeconomic Status and Health in the U.S.The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Research Network on Socioeconomic Status and Health, 1-52.
  2. Banerjee, A. V., & Mullainathan, S. (2008). Limited attention and income distribution. American Economic Review, 98(2), 489-93.
  3. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., & Henderson, A. (2018). Experimental methods: Measuring effort in economics experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 149, 74-87.
  4. Datta, S., & Mullainathan, S. (2014). Behavioral design: a new approach to development policy. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(1), 7-35.
  5. Hagenaars, A., & De Vos, K. (1988). The definition and measurement of poverty. Journal of human resources, 211-221.
  6. Hajimoladarvish, N. (2018). Fundamentals of Behavioral Economics, Tehran: Institutionalist Publishing. (In Persian).
  7. Haushofer, J., & Fehr, E. (2014). On the psychology of poverty. science, 344(6186), 862-867.
  8. Khodadadi, M. (2019). The effect of unequal pay and promotion on labor performance. Master Thesis, Department of Economics. Faculty of Management and Economics, Sharif University(In Persian).
  9. Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. science, 341(6149), 976-980.
  10. Mariani, M. (2017). The neuroscience of inequality: does poverty show up in children’s brains. The Guardian, 13.
  11. Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S., &Shafir, E. (2004). A behavioral-economics view of poverty. American Economic Review, 94(2), 419-423.
  12. Monahan, K., Cotteleer, J.,&Fisher,M. (2016). Does scarcity make you dumb?.Deloitte University Press. United States,1-20.
  13. Morovat,H., Sharif, M., & Nezakat, P. (2019). Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, Investigating the effect of cognitive biases (warm hand effect and hyperbolic discount rate) on environmental attitudes and behaviors in Iran.Scientific-Research Article, 6(4), 163-190 (In Persian).
  14. Mullainathan, S. (2015). The Science of Scarcity. Reprinted from Harvard Magazine.
  15. Oechssler, J., Roider, A., & Schmitz, P. W. (2009). Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 147-152.
  16. Raghfar, H., &Yousefvand, F. (2016). Parliamentary Political Science and Strategy.Scientific-Research Article, 23(88), 5-34 (In Persian).
  17. Safir, E., &Mullainathan, S. (2014). Lack of a look at individual and social shortcomings. Translated by Alijani Renani, H. (2018). Tehran: Phoenix Publishing )In Persian)
  18. Schilbach, F., Schofield, H., & Mullainathan, S. (2016). The psychological lives of the poor. American Economic Review, 106(5), 435-40.
  19. Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., &Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338(6107), 682-685.
  20. Shah, A. K., Zhao, J., Mullainathan, S., &Shafir, E. (2018). Money in the mental lives of the poor. Social Cognition, 36(1), 4-19.
  21. Tirado, L. (2014). Why Poor People Stay Poor?. Harvard Magazine website.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics