Analyzing Taxpayers' Tax Behavior with a Behavioral Economics Approach: Examining the Willingness to Pay Taxes Through a Discrete Choice Test

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

3 Iranian National Tax Administration, Tehran, Iran

4 PhD candidate at Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Combating tax evasion is one of the primary responsibilities of an economic system and, at its core, the tax administration of every country. Behavioral economics offers methods for achieving this goal. Since behavior is part of culture and culture itself is shaped by habits, if individuals can be led to believe that tax compliance is a correct habit, they will internalize it as a permanent behavior. Given that no structured research has yet been conducted on the role of habit strength in tax behavior, this study aimed to identify behavioral factors that influence the transformation of the habit of tax evasion into that of tax compliance.
 After reviewing the relevant literature and interviewing tax experts and representatives of various professional associations, eight cognitive biases were identified as components influencing tax behavior. Considering the number of levels for each component, 21,000 possible choice combinations were generated. Therefore, based on the D-efficient design method and using SAS software, ten choice cards were designed. Ultimately, after collecting completed questionnaires from real (individual) taxpayers in the city of Tabriz who were active during 2023 and 2024, the data were analyzed using the ordered logit model in STATA 13 software.
 The results revealed that cognitive biases, including the endowment effect, nudge effect, prospect theory, and present bias, significantly impact taxpayers’ behavior.
 Policymakers can leverage these cognitive biases to break the old habit loop and establish a new one oriented toward tax compliance.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbaszadeh, N., Ahmadian, M., Rahbar, F., & Abrishmi, H. (2013). Application of the choice experiment method in estimating the willingness to pay of Iranian households to avoid power outages. Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 48(4), 119-143 (In Persian).
  2. Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. Int Tax Public Finance, 19, 54–77.
  3. Amiri, M. (2017). Behavioral economics and tax evasion. Economics Research, 64, 95-130 (In Persian).
  4. Araei, V., Haj Mahmoud Attar, F. (2022). The effect of trust in government on voluntary compliance of taxpayers with the mediating role of tax justice perception. Financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 14(56), 243-264. (In Persian).
  5. Asgari, H., Roozitalab, A., & Mansouri, A. (2021). Behavioral analysis of willingness to pay taxes (a case study of semnan industrial town). Journal of Tax Research, 29(49), 7-32 (In Persian).
  6. Bagheri, B., Babajani, J., & Barzideh, F. (2019). Tax compliance factors in iranian tax system. Empirical Research in Accounting, 9(1), 284-313 (In Persian).
  7. Barzideh, F., & Ebrahimi Dardeh, S. (2019). Ranking effective behavioural factors affecting non-compliance in business tax from the professional perspective. Journal of Tax Research, 27(42), 43-72 (In Persian).
  8. Centre for International Economics. (2001). Review of willingness-to-pay methodologies. (Prepared for Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of NSW). Canberra & Sydney.
  9. Choi, J. H., & Kleiman, A. J. (2023). Subjective costs of tax compliance. L. Rev., 108, 1255.‏
  10. Congdon, W.J. Kling, J.R. Mullinathan, S. (2016). Policymaking and choice: public sector economics through the lens of behavioral economics. (Translated by Mostafa Nasr Esfahani). National Planning and Budget Organization (In Persian).
  11. Dehghan, S. (2018). Studying the effect of tax penalties and incentives on taxpayer compliance behavior using the perspective theory approach. PhD thesis, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch (In Persian).
  12. Dehghan Manshadi, F., & Roshan, A. (2015). Presenting a model for analyzing cultural factors affecting tax compliance (Investigating the role of financial corruption, cultural norms and social values ​​on tax compliance). 9th Iranian Conference on Fiscal and Tax Policies, Tehran (In Persian).
  13. Duhigg, Ch. (2019). The Power of Habit. (Translated by: Asghar Androudi), Dorr Danesh Bahman (In Persian).
  14. Dunning, T., Monestier, F., Pineiro, R., Rosenblatt, F., & Tuñón, G. (2017). Is paying taxes habit forming? Theory and evidence from Uruguay. University of California-Berkeley Working Paper.‏
  15. Ghahremanzadeh, M., Pishbahar, I., Einollahi. M., & Ferdosi, R. (2016). Identification of factors affecting agricultural credits repayment in maragheh county: an application of ordered logit model. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 47(1), 47-55 (In Persian).
  16. Godefroid, M. E., Plattfaut, R., & Niehaves, B. (2023). How to measure the status quo bias? A review of current literature. Management Review Quarterly, 73(4), 1667-1711.‏
  17. Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2010). Modeling ordered choices: A primer. Cambridge University Press.‏
  18. Haghjou, M. (2016). Estimating the Economic Value of Arasbaran Forest (Comparing Choice Experiment and Contingent Ranking Approaches. PhD thesis, University of Tabriz, Tabriz (In Persian).
  19. Hauptman, L., & Pavić, I. (2025). Sustainable Tax and Accounting Reporting in Building a New Tax Culture. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(6), 306.‏
  20. Hasas Yeganeh, Y., Ebrahimi Sarveolia, M. H., Alasvand, F., & Delavar, A. (2019). Importance of factors influencing intention to pay tax from the perspective of tax payers: Case study: Taxpayers of iranian national tax admission organization-tehran. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 8(29), 203-214 (In Persian).
  21. Khademi Gerashi, M. (2021). Why do I have to pay my income taxes? The effects of taxpayer`s perceived value on commitment to pay in light of the possibility of tax evasion. Management and Development Process, 33(4), 97-114 (In Persian).
  22. Khan Mohammadi, M.H., Karimi, S., Jafari, S.M. (2019). Designing a corporate tax compliance model based on grounded theory in the iranian tax system. Quarterly Scientific Research Journal of Accounting and Management Auditing Knowledge, 63, 163-178 (In Persian).
  23. Kurokawa, H., Mori, T., & Ohtake, F. (2020). A choice experiment on taxes: Are income and consumption taxes equivalent?. Journal of Behavioral Economics and Finance, 13, 53-70.‏
  24. lari Dashtbayaz, M., Ghaemmaghami, K., & Kahromi, G. (2016). The factors affect on tax evasion in south khorasan province :An emphasis on cultural dimentions. Iranian journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting, 1(1), 139-164 (In Persian).
  25. Lefebvre, M., Pestieau, P., Riedl, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2015). Tax evasion and social information: an experiment in Belgium, France, and the Netherlands. International Tax and Public Finance, 22(3), 401-425.‏
  26. Mahmoudi, H. (2018). Identifying factors affecting the preferences of organic tea consumers under the hypothesis of bias reduction and absenteeism characteristics in the choice test (case study of Tehran region one). PhD thesis, University of Tabriz, Tabriz (In Persian).
  27. Bjørnåvold, A., David, M., Mermet-Bijon, V., Beaumais, O., Crastes dit Sourd, R., Van Passel, S., & Martinet, V. (2023). To tax or to ban? A discrete choice experiment to elicit public preferences for phasing out glyphosate use in agriculture. PLoS One, 18(3), e0283131.‏
  28. Martinet, V., David, M., Mermet-Bijon, V., & Sourd, R. C. D. (2025). Cost vector effects in forced-choice discrete choice experiments: Assessing the acceptability of future glyphosate policies. Journal of choice modelling, 55, 100550.‏
  29. Mirshkari, A., & Hosseini, F. (2023). A comparative study of the way of compensation for moral damages: with emphasizing the judicial procedure of Iran. The Judiciarys Law Journal, 87(121), 351-378 (In Persian).
  30. Mohammadi, M., Gharakhani, S., Sameti, M., & Amiri, H. (2024). Simulating approaches to improve tax payments and reduce tax evasion behavior: an agent-based model. Economic Research, 58(4), 661-694 (In Persian).
  31. Mohammadipour, R., Rabi Beigi, H., Norush, I., & Saleh, R. (1402). Presenting a model of tax morale with a grounded theory approach. Quarterly Journal of Financial Economics. 17(2), 226-193 (In Persian).
  32. Mousavi jahromi, Y., Abdi, M., & Gholami, E. (2015) Computing iran’s VAT expenditures. Journal of Tax Research, 73(25), 45-69 (In Persian).
  33. MOUSAVI, J. Y. (2019). Investigating the behavior of individual business taxpayers: Behavioral economics approach.‏
  34. Nar, M. (2015). The effects of behavioral economics on tax amnesty. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 580-589.‏
  35. Olsen, J., Kang, M., & Kirchler, E. (2018). 13 Tax Psychology. The Cambridge handbook of psychology and economic behaviour, 11(8,296), 405.‏
  36. Parsapour, S., Rafiy, H., & Rahnoma, A. (2016). Socio-economic factors affecting overnight stays of domestic tourists (case study: Mashhad). Social Studies in Tourism, 7, 1-10 (In Persian).
  37. Rezaee, M., Maddah, M., & Mousavi Jahromi, Y. (2021). Investigating the effects of establishing a local taxation system on long- run regional economic growth in iran: Error-correction models approach. Economic Growth and Development Research, 11(42), 34-15 (In Persian).
  38. Richardson, G. (2008). The relationship between culture and tax evasion across countries: Additional evidence and extensions. Journal of international accounting, auditing and taxation, 17(2), 67-78.‏
  39. Salehnia, M. (2016). Investigating the heterogeneity of household preferences regarding the restoration of Lake Urmia using multilevel latent class and hierarchical Bayesian models. PhD thesis, University of Tabriz, Tabriz (In Persian).
  40. Sameti, M., Amiri, H., & Heydari, Z. (2016). The effect of tax morale on tax compliance (case study isfahan city). Journal of Economic Research and Policies, 23(75), 231-262 (In Persian).
  41. Sobhanian, S. M. H., Ebadi, J., Mehrara, M., & Akhavan Behbahani, A. (2015). Discrete choice experiment, an efficient approach to economic valuation of benefits in health projects and policies. Majlis and Rahbord, 21(80), 5-37 (In Persian).
  42. Sojoodi, S., Rezghi Ilkhchi, H., & Azizi Norouzabadi, E. (2024). Factors affecting tax compliance based on the theory of planned behavior: an investigation of taxpayers in the city of tabriz. Journal of Tax Research,32(62), 95-132 (In Persian).
  43. Tahvili, A., & Hadian, E. (2013). Tax evasion and its determinants in the iranian economy (1971-2007). Economic and Planning Research, 18(2), 39-58 (In Persian).
  44. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2018). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. (Translated by: Mehdi Habib Ollahi, Bahar Shirzadi, Kowsar Izak Shirian). Shafaf Publications (In Persian).
  45. Thaler, R. (2017). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral Economics (Translated by: Behnam Shahai). Mehraban Book Institute (In Persian).
  46. Throsby, D. (2012). Economy and culture. (Translated by: Kazem Farhadi). Ney Publishing (In Persian).
  47. Weber, T. O., Fooken, J., & Herrmann, B. (2014). Behavioural economics and taxation. European Commission Taxation Papers.‏
  48. Yang, W. The Endowment Effect: A Behavioural Economic Perspective on Land Use Policy, Environmental Protection and Taxation.‏
  49. Zehi, N. &, Mohammadkhanli, S. (2011). A study on factors affecting tax evasion (a case study of east azerbaijan province). Journal of Tax Research, 18(9), 25-60 (In Persian).
Applied Theories of Economics
Volume 12, Issue 4 - Serial Number 47
December 2025
Pages 159-176

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics