Impact of Gender Unemployment on Environmental Pollution in Iran’s Provinces

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Econometrics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract

One of the most challenging issues in environmental economics has been addressing the fundamental question of whether economic growth leads to environmental pollution. The gender dimension of the labor market, which can influence environmental behaviors, has so far received limited attention in environmental modeling. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between gendered unemployment and environmental pollution within the framework of the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis across the provinces of Iran. The research data are collected annually for 31 provinces over the period 2011–2021, and panel data methods are employed to estimate the effects of female and male unemployment rates on carbon dioxide emissions. The findings indicate that economic growth leads to a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions; therefore, Iran’s provinces are located on the downward-sloping segment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. The results also show that an increase in male unemployment is associated with a reduction in environmental pollution, whereas an increase in female unemployment leads to intensified environmental degradation. Moreover, an increase in gender inequality in unemployment also results in higher environmental pollution. Based on these results, the Environmental Phillips Curve hypothesis is confirmed only for men in Iran’s provinces. The findings further indicate that improving women’s employment levels and increasing their economic participation can contribute to better environmental conditions. These results highlight the importance of women’s participation in the labor market from an environmental perspective and demonstrate that women’s employment not only does not have a negative impact on the environment, but can also be a factor in improving environmental quality.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Achuo, E. D., Nchofoung, T. N., Zanfack, L. J. T., & Epoge, C. E. (2023). The nexus between labour force participation and environmental sustainability: Global comparative evidence. Heliyon, 9(11).‏
  2. Akbari, H. (2013). The role of women in sustainable development of the environment. Woman in Development & Politics, 10(4), 27-56 (In Persian).
  3. Ali, I., & Rahman, A. (2024). Environmental degradation: causes, effects and solutions. Int J Multidiscip Res, 6(3), 1-10.‏
  4. Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Dynamic panel data models. In Econometric analysis of panel data (pp. 187-228). Cham: Springer International Publishing.‏
  5. Bhakta, B., & Maiti, S. (2025). Economic Growth and Environmental Degradation in ASEAN-10 Countries: An Econometric Descriptive Analysis. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics, 22(2), 73–81.
  6. Bilgili, F., Khan, M., & Awan, A. (2022). Is there a gender dimension of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from Asian countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(3), 2387–2418.
  7. Calléja, L. (2022). The Gender‑Environment Nexus: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Development. Political Observer, (17), 53‑68.
  8. Chen, J., & Wu, C. (2025). Do economic growth targets aggravate environmental pollution? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 17(14), 6534.
  9. Dai, S., Dai, Y., & Yu, H. (2024). The effect of gender gap in labor market participation on carbon emission efficiency: State-level empirical evidence from the US. Energy & Environment, 0958305X241277623.‏
  10. Echavarren, J. M. (2023). The gender gap in environmental concern: support for an ecofeminist perspective and the role of gender egalitarian attitudes. Sex Roles, 89(9), 610-623.‏
  11. Ghaem Zabihi, S. M., Kamalian, R., Akbari, F., & Najimiadani, A. A. (2024). Threshold effect of financial development on carbon dioxide emission: Emphasis on the role of good governance. Iranian Journal of Energy Economics, 50(13), 11–48 (In Persian).
  12. Golkhandan, A. (2024). Asymmetric Effect of Unemployment on Load Capacity Factor (LCF) in Selected MENA Countries: Analysis of the Environmental Phillips Curve (EPC) Hypothesis. New Economy and Trad, 19(64), 133-173 (In Persian).
  13. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.
  14. Horobet, A., Belascu, L., Radulescu, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Botoroga, C.-A., & Negreanu, C.-C. (2024). Exploring the nexus between greenhouse emissions, environmental degradation and green energy in Europe: A critique of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energies, 17(5109).
  15. Hosseinnezhad, F. (2017). Women and the environment: Ecofeministic approach to environmental attitudes and behavior in Iran. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 1(1), Article 4.
  16. Jabari, L., & Salem, A. A. (2023). Investigating the Nonlinear Effect of Structural Labor Change on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Iran’s Provinces Using the Panel Quantile Model. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, 28(96), 123-162 (In Persian).
  17. Li, Y., Wang, B., & Saechang, O. (2022). Is Female a more pro‑environmental gender? Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8002.
  18. Mahmood, H., & Tanveer, M. (2024). Examining the Role of Women’s Labor Participation in CO₂ Emissions in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(3), 102–108.
  19. Maiti, S., & Chakraborty, C. (2023). Does air pollution affect labour productivity in Indian manufacturing? Evidence from state-level data. In The impact of environmental emissions and aggregate economic activity on industry: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 183-194). Emerald Publishing Limited.‏
  20. Pinho, M. (2025). Climate change anxiety and pro-environmental behaviours: disentangling gender disparities. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, 1589501.‏
  21. Shastri, S., Mohapatra, G., & Giri, A. K. (2023). The Environmental Philips Curve from a gender perspective: empirical evidence from India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(7), 17487-17496.‏
  22. Valiollahi Bisheh, A., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., & Moallem, M. (2023). Role of Rural Women in the Sustainability of Iran's Agroecosystems. Journal of Agroecology, 16(60), 219-245 (In Persian)
  23. World Bank. (2023). CO₂ emissions (metric tons per capita), excluding land-use change and forestry (LULUCF). Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.GHG.CO2.MT.CE.AR5?locations=IR
  24. World Bank. (2023). Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+). Retrieved from:https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FE.NE.ZS?locations=IR
  25. World Bank. (2023). Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15+). Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.MA.NE.ZS?locations=IR
  26. World Bank. (2023). Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (national estimate). Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.UEM.TOTL.NE.ZS?locations=IR   

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics