Impact of the Central Bank’s Contractionary Monetary Policy on Banks’ Risk-Taking: A Factor-Based Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Departmentof Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran

2 Ph.D of econmic, Departmentof Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran

Abstract

The Banking Network has become a popular subject for empirical and methodological research that employs artificial intelligence (AI) methods, including agent-based modeling. The agent-based approach (ABM) plays a crucial role in evaluating the performance of banking networks under external shocks, which may trigger failures within the network of agents. The present study uses this approach to examine the impact of contractionary monetary policy on the risk-taking behavior of the banking system, specifically in terms of the amount of lending to firms in the real sector. The model includes five agents: banks, depositors, the central bank, firms, and a clearinghouse, of which the first two agents are intelligent, while the others are non-intelligent. The model encompasses ten major banks—Mellat, Tejarat, Sepah, Maskan, Keshavarzi, Ayandeh, Parsian, Pasargad, Saderat, and Refah—over the period 2018–2023, with uniform distribution in size. In this study, the total amount of loans to clients in the real sector is used as a proxy for bank risk. The findings indicate that contractionary monetary policy prompts banks to reduce the volume of loans to firms in the real sector, thereby taking on lower risk. However, simultaneously, the share of higher-risk loans increases. Moreover, the central bank’s contractionary policy, by activating the interbank market, alleviates liquidity constraints in the banking system. Nevertheless, the increased interbank transactions lead to greater risk propagation across the banking network. Consequently, under such a policy, resolving liquidity shortages in the banking network results in higher risk transmission along with reduced credit to the real economy.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Adão, L. F., Silveira, D., Ely, R. A., & Cajueiro, D. O. (2021). The Impacts of Monetary Policy on Banks' Loan Portfolio Risk-taking. Available at SSRN 3898624.‏
  2. Adrian, T., & Shin, H. S. (2010). Financial intermediaries and monetary economics. In Handbook of monetary economics. pp. 601-650.
  3. Agur, I., & Demertzis, M. (2012). Excessive bank risk taking and monetary policy. ECB Working Paper, 1457.
  4. Alexandre, M., Lima, G. T., Riccetti, L., & Russo, A. (2023). The financial network channel of monetary policy transmission: an agent-based model. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 18(3), 533-571.
  5. Barroso, R. V., Lima, J. I. A. V., Lucchetti, A. H., & Cajueiro, D. O. (2016). Interbank network and regulation policies: an analysis through agent-based simulations with adaptive learning. Journal of Network Theory in Finance, 2, 53-86.
  6. Beyer, A. (2017). The Transmission Channels of Monetary, Macro- and Micro-prudential Policies and Their Interrelations. Occasional paper series / European Central Bank. European Central Bank.
  7. Bookstaber, R. Agent-based models for financial crises (2017). Annual Review of Financial Economics, v. 9, p. 85–100.
  8. Borio, C., & Zhu, H. (2012). Capital regulation, risk-taking and monetary policy: a missing link in the transmission mechanism? Journal of Financial stability, 8 , 251-236.
  9. Brei, M., Borio, C., & Gambacorta, L. (2020). Bank intermediation activity in a low‐interest‐rate environment. Economic Notes, 49(2), e12164.
  10. Cajueiro, D. O., & Tabak, B. M. (2008). The role of banks in the brazilian interbank market: Does bank type matter? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387, 6825-6836.
  11. Camerer, C., & Ho, T. (1999). Experience weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica, 67 , 827-874.
  12. Chen, M., Wu, J., Jeon, B. N., & Wang, R. (2017). Monetary policy and bank risk-taking: Evidence from emerging economies. Emerging Markets Review, 31 , 116-140.
  13. Claessens, S., & Valencia, F. (2013). The interaction between monetary and macroprudential policies. Approved By Olivier Blanchard and José Viñals, IMF.
  14. de Moraes, C. O., Montes, G. C., & Antunes, J. A. P. (2016). How does capital regulation react to monetary policy? new evidence on the risk-taking channel. Economic Modelling, 56 , 177-186.
  15. De Nicolò, G., Dell'Ariccia, G., Laeven, L., & Valencia, F. (2010). Monetary policy and bank risk taking. Available at SSRN 1654582.‏
  16. Dehghan Dehnavi, Mohammad Ali, Amiri, Meysam and Khorshidsavar, Amin (2025). Factors affecting banks' risk-taking with emphasis on monetary policy, regulatory requirements and macroeconomics. Iranian Economic Research. 29(101). 83-118 (In Persian).
  17. Eslamloueyan, K., Yazdanpanah, H., & Khalilnezhad, Z. (2018). The existence of a risk-taking channel of monetary policy transmission in Iran’s banking system. Journal of Economic Modeling Research, 9(31), 7-40 (In Persian).
  18. Fievet, L., & Sornette, D. (2018). Calibrating emergent phenomena in stock markets with agent based models. PloS one, 13(3), e0193290.‏
  19. Gatti, D. D., Fagiolo, G., Gallegati, M., Richiardi, M., & Russo, A. (2018). Agent-Based Models in Economics: A Toolkit . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Georgiadis, G., & Zhu, F. (2021). Foreign-currency exposures and the financial channel of exchange rates: Eroding monetary policy autonomy in small open economies? Journal of International Money and Finance, 110 , 102265.
  21. Jimenez, G., Ongena, S., Peydr_o, J.-L., & Saurina, J. (2014). Hazardous times for monetary policy: what do twenty-three million bank loans say about the e_ects of monetary policy on credit risk-taking? Econometrica, 82 , 463-505.
  22. Komijani A, Alinejad-Mehrabani F. (2012). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Monetary Transmission Channels on Production and Inflation besides Analyzing their Relative Importance in Iran’s Economy. JEPR. 17(2), 39-63 (In Persian).
  23. Lucchetta, M. (2007). What do data say about monetary policy, bank liquidity and bank risk taking? Economic Notes, 36 , 189-203.
  24. Lux, T. (2016). A model of the topology of the bank - firm credit network and its role as channel of contagion. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control , 66 , 36-53.
  25. Nazemfar R, tehranchian A, elmi Z, asghari M. (2022). Intelligent multi-agent modeling of the interbank network and evaluation of the impact of regulatory policies. 30 (101): 199-235 (In Persian).
  26. Nazemfar, R. and Tehranchian, A. M. (2025). The influence of the systematic risk of the country's banking network on credit risk: new empirical evidence from the random dynamic bank-oriented multi-agent model (DBMM).. Journal of Econometric Modelling, 9(4), 133-158.
  27. Neuenkirch, M., & Nöckel, M. (2018). The risk-taking channel of monetary policy transmission in the euro area. Journal of Banking & Finance, 93, 71-91.‏
  28. Peters, F., Neuberger, D., Reinhardt, O., & Uhrmacher, A. (2022). A basic macroeconomic agent-based model for analyzing monetary regime shifts. Plos one, 17(12), e0277615.
  29. Poledna, S., & Thurner, S. (2016). Elimination of systemic risk in _nancial networks by means of a systemic risk transaction tax. Quantitative Finance, (pp. 1-15).
  30. Raberto, M., Teglio, A., & Cincotti, S. (2012). Debt, deleveraging and business cycles: An agent-based perspective. Economics, 6(1), 20120027.
  31. Sajadi, S. S. , Khosravinejad, A. A. , Momeni Vesalian, H. and Emamverdi, G. (2023). Investigating the Causal Relationship Between Bank Credits and Economic Growth: Markov Switching Nonlinear Granger Causality Approach. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 10(2), 31-64 (In Persian).
  32. Smets, F. (2018). Financial stability and monetary policy: How closely interlinked?. 35th issue (June 2014) of the International Journal of Central Banking.‏
  33. Steinbacher, M., Raddant, M., Karimi, F., Camacho Cuena, E., Alfarano, S., Iori, G., & Lux, T. (2021). Advances in the agent-based modeling of economic and social behavior. SN Business & Economics, 1(7), 99.
  34. Vianna, M. T. (2024). Monetary Policy and Income Distribution in a Multisectoral AB-SFC Model. Review of Political Economy, 36(3), 1019-1041.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics