Investigating the Effect of Cognitive biases (hot-hand effect and Hyperbolic discount Rate) on Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors in Iran

Document Type : Research Paper


1 ŮŽAssistant Professor of Economics, Faculty Member of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University

2 Assistant Professor of Economics, Faculty Member of Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University

3 M.A. Student in Economics, Allameh Tabataba’i University


The theoretical and empirical literature of behavioral economics shows that people in their decision making have a behavioral and cognitive bias. Therefore, the actual behavior of individuals is not always consistent with economic and rational human behavior. Two of the most important behavioral biases that can play an important role in people's environmental attitudes and behavior are the hot-hand effect and hyperbolic discount rate. In this study, we tried to study the effect of these two biases on the attitude and environmental behavior of individuals in Tehran using the semi-experimental approach and difference in difference regression. In this regard, a sample of 90 subjects was divided into two groups (control and treatment group). The data were collected through a questionnaire in two stages before and after the test. And the difference in difference regression was done. the results showed that: First, the training and awareness of behavioral and cognitive bias improve the environmental attitudes and behavior of individuals. Therefore, policymakers should consider information and education about cognitive bias. Second, demographic variables such as level of education, age, gender, and marriage do not have a significant effect on differences in environmental attitudes and behaviors of individuals.


Main Subjects

  1. Ansari, S., Pourfarj, H., Zare, M., & A., Amini (2015). Introduction to behavioral economics: The concept, methodology and methods of extracting preferences. Adaptive Economics, 2(1). 37-69 (In Persian).
  2. Baddeley, M. (2016). Behavioral approaches to managing household energy consumption. In New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioral Economics (pp. 213-235). Springer International Publishing.
  3. Cartwright, Edward. (2018). Behavioral economics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  4. Dhami, S. (2016). The foundations of behavioral economic analysis. New York, NY, US: Oxford.
  5. Gilad, B., Kaish, S., & P. D., Loeb (1984). From economic behavior to behavioral economics: The behavioral uprising in economics. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 13(1), 1-22.
  6. Gribbons, B. (1997). True and quasi experimental designs. Retrived March 2009 from : http// asp?
  7. Hesabi, H., Khorsandi, M., Abbasinejad, H., & H., Dehghan Shurkand (2018). The Effect of Environmental Performance on Happiness: An Inter-country Analysis. Economic Modeling, 12(2), 49-72 (In Persian).
  8. Hossein Zadeh, A. (2011). Cognitive biases and their role in dissatisfaction with life. Journal of Psychology and Religion, 4(3), 125-144 (In Persian).
  9. Hosseini, H. (2004). Where did the behavioral economy emerge in the 1950s and early 1960s: the university of michigan or carnegie?.  Quarterly Journal of Economic Research and Policy, 29(1), 3-34 (In Persian).
  10. Jahanbakhsh Ganjeh, M.,  Sadat, N., Jatan, R., & S., Jahanbakhsh Ganjeh (1392). Changing the attitude of policy-making environment based on social psychology and behavioral economics. the First National Conference on Conservation Planning, Environmental Protection and Stable Development (pp 250-259).Hamedan: Anjoman Arzyaban Mohite zist Hegmataneh (In Persian).
  11. Just, D, R ( 2014). Introduction to behavioral economics: noneconomic factors That Shape Economic Decisions, Wiley; edition 1.
  12. Karp, L. (2005). Global warming and hyperbolic discounting. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2), 261-282.
  13. Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443-477.
  14. MacKerron, G, J., & Mourato, S (2009). life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecological Economics, 68 (5), 1441-1453.
  15. MacKerron, G, J., and Mourato, S (2013). happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23 (5). 992-1000.
  16. Naderi, E., & Seif Naraghi. M (1373). Research methods and their evaluation in human science. Tehran: Agah Publication (In Persian).
  17. Rahbar, F., Motavassel, M., & M., Amiri (1392).  Behavioral economists and their theories. Journal of Planning and Budget, 18(1), 133-165 (In Persian).
  18. Rahimi, A., Morovat, H., & A., Faridzad (1395). The role of attitudes and belives on electricity consumption of households in iran.  Journal of Energy Economics of Iran, 6(3), 162-129. (In Persian)
  19. Saeedi, A.,  & Farhanian S. M. J. (1391). fundamentals of behavioral economics and finance. Tehran: Information Company And Stock Exchange Services (In Persian).
  20. Sunstein, C. R., & Reisch, L. A. (2016). Behaviorally green: Why, which and when defaults can help. In New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioral Economics (pp. 161-194). Springer International Publishing.
  21. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(2), 39-60.
  22. Wilkinson, N.,&  Klaes, M. (2018). An interodution to behavioral economics, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.